In this crisis where no coalition has formed strongly to find communication with that which calls itself the enemy of the public by their wrongful deeds of destruction at scale could only be founded as a position with the lawful calling out of what question they do pose? Here is a first attempt at a Large Document for holding by the Inter-Nation[s] to consider their question not yet forwarded:
The Large Document draftcopy1 (pdf) sections may follow
Here reproduced with some formatting to indicate lack or transition of notions:
Rules of engagement ad recall contain before the matter of legislation
for in substance founding of conventions subscribed even prior exposition
is reached understanding basis for Declaration of War amiss
By volume of violence wrought against men, women, children, architecture, luxuries, art, literature, et cetera
All Goods the requisite questione
to regard what basis such destruction were justification Just?
As impossibility vastness of destruction
what service did discern the manifolded unjustly cancelled nor eliminated
yet war remains on the horizon by means of collapsed plot invisible Requested
but by discernment if declaration remains unfounded whether not yet called or later uttered retains that accountability through the eras of history that is in time.
Doubt of that coherence
in action even if fragments and bits recalled to recollection some parts of some rationale
for an impossibility of interpretation for response to What Question
that involved in participation in the
inter-National
Irrational violence where lacking justification is to find obstruction their raising of each level of conflict to war for must towards conclusion for peace to go for close.
For engagement in each battle bounded so finite in numbers engaged
on each side accountable to delimit whatever in destruction closure in any art of war
Civility in forecasting to projection to remaining conflict due the loss of
No loss in historical culture nor too high a toll from
consensus for the retainment of all civilized make.
Yet what tell over this span was meant was the Question in part.
Losses’ outcome is poverty yet everywhere, of arts and
culture, and the treasures of civilization to be kept by each world’s own while
battle against the peaceful lot that blood of even innocents were spilled
That Question is Why?
Against whom these battles been wrought Few on this side of peace were wont to raise the stakes
but asked Why. Some did reason that speculated what overdue injustice did occur
and found as often the perfection strifed for did never yet reach but in this
we had tried as individuals, as groups, and as communities.
Should conflict seek rational closure
when given reason as legally found then such resolution to the happiness of all
will reach all’s sight that in our midst there action on many veins achieved
fruitation decided certain particular Outcomes must be set as objectives
that success by the Will of Inter-Nations should overcome measeley objections from not reason found.
In that cooperation for objectives under peace
position each of us upon The Ratio of the World to call for this Resolution in Outcome Eventual
when places each above that originally in situ and to the elevation
by knowledge respond to but not escalate conflict.
An instance, if land were the question, how then
resolved but plan to be drafted over the picture of whatever is so to uplift what people and
works and even delimited battles so for triumph in peace eventual Shall Arrive.
The bright idea is aloft where but above us of happiness and peace
sought sown in any populace World if ordered could find such seeds
of notions favored by some, many, or all.
If ordered, the World holding all in each for beholding could hold each world
in order ie. many order each one for each own world within its borders
Such true, why the Question brought to fore by these chaos recent
but error in some matters
for determination by the inter-Nation in this is another part of the Question.
What went wrong must have pressed against one or some or many worlds but adjudication
with the determination in legality remains amiss so such fact for knowing
by the Inter-Nation is to be forged in response to this part of the Question
Just recall of all Relevant Facts comprises
in this History’s time for that era to be known Tomorrow.
Here signs away is not here yet egalitarian world
by our leaf and stars
for what numbers in simple quantities and in statistical exposition had startled these two
nations
but to respond to yet asked question duly to reach exposition
is the Request for Understanding the whatever circumstances
under the labels acting calls for war
so then to withdraw or interrupt unnecessary conflict fore situate all countries here
of the peaceful and hardworking that
to avoid non-intended destruction that capacity to find autonomic control and by
Our Own Intent regarding against the destructive together of that rid and draw interceptance
over those differences miniscule by eyes above and towards cooperation
of founded.
LOGOS